STUDIO CHRONOTOPE
  • Dispatches
  • Zero
  • PROJECTS
    • Art and Architecture Quotations
    • Venice Architecture Biennale: The Singapore Pavilion (Singapore)
    • ArcHIVE
    • Helsinki Hive
    • Curating Whampoa (Singapore)
    • Learning from Shenzhen (China)
    • Helsinki Polybrids (Finland)
  • Teaching
    • Transportable Archives (NUS)
    • Architecture Thesis (NUS)
    • Last Home (NUS)
    • Museum Alive! (NUS)
    • Archival Futures (NUS)
    • Future Memories (NUS)
    • Philips-NUS Studio (NUS)
    • Weakness as an Urban Strategy and Mode of Design (NUS)
    • Form Follows Health and Wellbeing (NUS)
    • Spatialising Values (NUS)
    • Master of Architecture. Emphasis in Interior Architecture (SAIC)
    • Beppu Street Studio (SAIC)
    • MFA in Studio (SAIC)
    • Bunka Oudan (SAIC)
    • ManifesTEA (SAIC)
    • I-Leap Art Event (Singapore)
  • Text
    • Yì Jiàng
    • Hamawaki
    • Re-Tooling Architectural Education: Ideas from the Healthcare 2030 Design Studio in Singapore
    • Social Curating and Archiving
    • Uncovering the Infraordinary
    • The Living Museum
    • Mr. H (孔生)
    • Informal Religious Shrines: Curating Community Assets in Hong Kong and Singapore
    • Between Making and Action- Ideas for a Relational Design Pedagogy
    • Unbuilding
    • The Artfulness of Design
    • Interior Architecture- An Architect's Perspective
    • Crisis, Dialogue, Imagination
    • Reflections on Chinese Landscape Painting and Garden
    • The City
    • Furnishing the City
    • Constructing Ground
    • Sense of Materiality
    • Negotiated Territories
    • Intimate Immensity
    • Re-Contextualizing the Design Studio
    • Dialogical Strategy in Architecture Education
    • Expanded Role of Interior Architecture Education
    • Migropolis
  • About
  • Dispatches
  • Zero
  • PROJECTS
    • Art and Architecture Quotations
    • Venice Architecture Biennale: The Singapore Pavilion (Singapore)
    • ArcHIVE
    • Helsinki Hive
    • Curating Whampoa (Singapore)
    • Learning from Shenzhen (China)
    • Helsinki Polybrids (Finland)
  • Teaching
    • Transportable Archives (NUS)
    • Architecture Thesis (NUS)
    • Last Home (NUS)
    • Museum Alive! (NUS)
    • Archival Futures (NUS)
    • Future Memories (NUS)
    • Philips-NUS Studio (NUS)
    • Weakness as an Urban Strategy and Mode of Design (NUS)
    • Form Follows Health and Wellbeing (NUS)
    • Spatialising Values (NUS)
    • Master of Architecture. Emphasis in Interior Architecture (SAIC)
    • Beppu Street Studio (SAIC)
    • MFA in Studio (SAIC)
    • Bunka Oudan (SAIC)
    • ManifesTEA (SAIC)
    • I-Leap Art Event (Singapore)
  • Text
    • Yì Jiàng
    • Hamawaki
    • Re-Tooling Architectural Education: Ideas from the Healthcare 2030 Design Studio in Singapore
    • Social Curating and Archiving
    • Uncovering the Infraordinary
    • The Living Museum
    • Mr. H (孔生)
    • Informal Religious Shrines: Curating Community Assets in Hong Kong and Singapore
    • Between Making and Action- Ideas for a Relational Design Pedagogy
    • Unbuilding
    • The Artfulness of Design
    • Interior Architecture- An Architect's Perspective
    • Crisis, Dialogue, Imagination
    • Reflections on Chinese Landscape Painting and Garden
    • The City
    • Furnishing the City
    • Constructing Ground
    • Sense of Materiality
    • Negotiated Territories
    • Intimate Immensity
    • Re-Contextualizing the Design Studio
    • Dialogical Strategy in Architecture Education
    • Expanded Role of Interior Architecture Education
    • Migropolis
  • About

Next Helsinki Architectural Competition

4/24/2015

 
Picture
Picture
"Helsinki Polybrids: Nexus of Art, Agency and Society" has been recognized by the jury panel of the Next Helsinki international architectural competition chaired by Michael Sorkin. Among the jury members are Juhani Pallasmaa, Walter Hood, Sharon Zukin and Mabel Wilson. There were over 200 entries from 40 countries.

”Almost like a dictionary of human thought and collective imagination.” (Free quote from jury member Juhani Pallasmaa)
https://www.facebook.com/TheNextHelsinki

'Almost everything in the world today is mobile. Why should art be static?' Juhani Pallasmaa #NextHelsinki
https://twitter.com/CheckpointHki

​https://homes.yahoo.com/news/adventures-architecture-next-helsinki-adds-212325775.html

http://www.nexthelsinki.org/


My shortlisted proposal and the other 200 over entries form a collective and creative counterpoint to the corporate driven art market initiative of the Guggenheim Museum. Our proposals are part of the major debate over the long term value of the Guggenheim Helsinki project, which has faced massive push backs from Finnish citizens and prompted the setting up of an alternative international architectural competition. Since the Great Recession, city officials are realizing that big, iconic projects are becoming harder to push through in parliament because citizens are demanding for greater investment in social infrastructures instead. However, to avoid financing public art is also ill-advised as it is an important contributor to the culture and economic vitality of cities. A new model of art-making, curatorial practice, presentation, support, housing and archival will need to be designed.

To avoid succumbing to the seduction of another one-off piece of iconic architecture costing billions of dollars to build, exploits cheap migrant labor and requires long-term, expensive maintenance, my entry re-frames the making, curating, exhibition and sustenance of artworks as a bottom-up, community driven activity that involves a broad spectrum of stakeholders in the city. It sees economic value of art not limited to how much one can afford to pay and sell at an astronomical price later but a more socially distributive model where the ecology of production, distribution and use (and re-use) is intertwined with the everyday life of the Finnish residents. Instead of scaling up even bigger as most contemporary museums seem to suffer from these days, my entry proposes to scale-out into the different neighborhoods by borrowing the city’s existing tram lines and stops. Through the process of creating the multiple art polybrids in the city, the tram lines and stops, which serve a vast section of the Helsinki residents and are in a state of decline, get to be refurbished and renewed at the same time. This twinning of art and public infrastructure makes good economic sense. The art polybrids are also way more accessible than a singular building, and are more effective in harnessing the collective imagination and creativity of the people. Museum goers are no loner passive consumers of a paid experience. They have the power and the opportunity to co-curate, to make art and in the long run, strengthened community bonding and identity, as well as fostering a more inclusive and socially resilient society. Helsinki Polybrids: The Nexus of Art, Society and Agency is therefore designed to offer a multi-scalar, horizontally distributed, economically and socially sustainable re-framing of art, its production and experience for a 21st
Nordic city. 

The entry was exhibited in the recently concluded Tallinn Architecture Biennale in Estonia under the Research and Development Lab, which saw 1600 visitors over 12 days. The result of the Next Helsinki Competition has also been featured in many influential architecture and design websites, and the Finnish Broadcasting Company. In 2016, the book UR: NextHelsinki by Terreform containing the short-listed entries and essays will be published to document the process and the discourse surrounding the alternative competition, which no doubt will rouse further interest and attention. Academics too, have shared their perspectives on the contentious issue. Writing on the shortlisted entries for the Next Helsinki architectural competition, Peggy Deemer (2015) wrote, “The cultural value of this competition will probably not be in the form of creative capital—although the shortlisted proposals offer excellent thinking on what makes a city work such that art can be appreciated.” (para. 9) Referring to the Next Helsinki architectural competition again, Deemer (2015) was convinced that, “its very existence as performance, display, and conversation—its cultural capital—forces the Guggenheim to scurry and scratch for its rewards.” (para. 9)

Besides being in a critical moment in the global discourse to unpack, critique and contextualize the value and purpose of such lavish projects, my shortlisted entry offered an alternative model to the Guggenheim museum franchise that weaved together the art, mobility, tourism, social support and ecological systems in the city. On a professional level, my proposal is a continuation of my research on and formation of a parallel architectural practice and education model inspired by the arts. According to the Legal Information Institute (2015), the definition of the ‘the Arts’ by the United States Congress includes architecture, besides the commonly accepted artistic practices such as sculpture, painting and photography. This inclusive definition opens up the possibilities for the creative renewal of not only the architectural profession but the teaching and learning of architecture as well.
​

The breadth and scope of design services have also increased enormously in recent decades to encompass service design, design activism and strategic design, to name a few of the new fields. The strategic design thinking and human-centered problem identification skills used by architects in their daily practice can therefore be developed and marketed as new skills-sets and services to buffer against another economic crisis. Fluid/Soundings in London and AMO in the Netherlands are excellent examples of such an interdisciplinary practice.  On the other hand, the nomination of architecture collective Assemble in the U.K. for the 2105 Turner Prize in Art is a strong endorsement of design activism and the art-design nexus of contemporary spatial practice. In my conversation with a design strategist working in the multidisciplinary American architecture firm Gensler, it was very clear to her that their major clients are not only interested in just a well designed and sustainable building but also a strategic vision that aligns architecture with social and business innovations, as well as environmental stewardship. Architect Michael Sorkin, the organizer of The Next Helsinki architectural competition puts it most provocatively when he declared in an interview with the U.S. based Metropolis magazine, “We invite competition entries from any and all, includes any of the 1,700 losers from the Guggenheim competition whose work looks beyond simply building a museum on the site.” (M, Sorkin, personal communication. Jan 22, 2015).

​Reference
Deemer, Peggy. (2015).The Guggenheim Helsinki Competition: What is the Value Proposition? Avery Review: Critical Essays on Architecture. Issue No. 9. Retrieved from http://www.averyreview.com/issues/8/the-guggenheim-helsinki-competition


Legal Information Institute. Retrieved from Cornell University Law School site https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/20/952
Picture
Picture
Revised drawings showing the ecology of existing infrastructure, education and cultural institutions, social agencies and parks as spaces for art making, sharing, presentation and community engagement.
Picture
Picture
Picture
Architect, Professor and competition judge Juhani Pallasmaa's acknowledging the Helsinki Polybrids entry in his essay, Back To The Starting Line.

Comments are closed.

    Archives

    February 2025
    August 2023
    July 2023
    May 2023
    February 2023
    April 2022
    April 2020
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    May 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    September 2011

    Categories

    All
    Active Aging
    Airport
    America
    Architecture
    Art
    Asia
    Assignments
    Chicago
    Chinatown
    Chinese
    Cities
    Cranbrook
    Creativity
    Culture
    Curating
    Curating Whampoa
    Department Of Remembering And Forgetting
    Design
    Form And Forming
    Hong Kong
    Improvization
    Informal Appropriations
    Interior Urbanism
    Japan
    Landlord Spirit
    Landscape
    Language
    Living Museum
    Parallel Worlds
    Pedagogy
    Public Interest Design
    Quotations
    Singapore
    Sleeping
    So Uk
    Spirituality
    Structures
    Student Projects
    Time
    Toronto
    Trees And Plants
    Unbuilding
    Urban Artifacts
    Urban Hacking
    Urbanism
    Wah Fu
    Whampoa

    RSS Feed